Court Halts Federal Push for State Voter Rolls
A federal judge struck down the Justice Department's policy after states resisted sharing data, as Democrats prepare for midterms.
By Rebecca Svoboda ·

A federal district court in Washington, D.C., vacated the Justice Department's policy for collecting state voter records on October 9. The ruling declares the administration's data collection arbitrary, capricious, and beyond its legal authority. The Justice Department has appealed the decision to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The legal battle stems from the administration's effort to obtain millions of state voter files for law enforcement purposes. A University of Wisconsin-Madison tally counts 31 federal lawsuits from the executive branch seeking this data. Most states have refused the requests, citing state privacy laws and the Constitution. The White House framed these moves as necessary to protect election integrity after the SAVE America Act stalled in the Republican-led Senate.
White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis told NPR in October that President Donald Trump has done more than any other president to ensure free and fair elections. However, a group of Democratic lawmakers, election litigators, and scholars formed an election protection task force this summer. They describe their mission as preparing the public and local officials to act so results are honored if the administration uses routine election features as evidence of fraud.
Marc Elias, an election litigator, stated his firm has been involved in dozens of lawsuits across every state. One major case involved a presidential order directing the Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots only to registered voters on specific lists. The Supreme Court halted that order. The Department of Homeland Security also sought state voter rolls, stating it wants to find noncitizens illegally registered to vote.
Task force members worry that slow vote counting in states like California and Alaska could be presented as fraudulent behavior. They argue the executive branch has inserted itself into a state-led process without constitutional authority. Justin Vail of Protect Democracy, a former special assistant to President Joe Biden, described a three-step playbook from the president: deceive, disrupt, and deny. Vail said the president's July remarks urging passage of the SAVE America Act were meant to sow doubt about November's elections.
In Congress, Democrats are using oversight tools to monitor the process. The House has operated a staff election observer program since the 1980s, but this cycle brings the first Senate version. Senators Chuck Schumer and Alex Padilla announced that more than 100 staff from both parties agreed to observe voting and tabulation. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has not said whether Republican staff will join.
Election law experts consulted by NPR agreed the Constitution assigns election administration to the states and Congress, not the president. Vanita Gupta of NYU's Center for Law and Public Trust said the road to a new Congress may be messy, but she remains confident that people will have free and fair elections so long as they do not take their right to vote for granted.
Source: NPR
More Politics · National news · Report a business · Got a Story?





