AdvertiseDonate
LatestBrooklyn Nets Stun Pacers With 98-90 Home Win
DetroitToledoClevelandFort WayneColumbusPittsburghBuffaloCincinnati
Monday, November 2, 2026Fresh headlines, all day.
Newz Broadcast · 220 W Congress St Floors 2,3,4, Detroit, MI 48226
News · Indianapolis

Judge Permanently Blocks Trump's $10 Billion Libel Case Against Wall Street Journal

A federal judge in Miami ruled that the president failed to prove the newspaper acted with actual malice when publishing details about a birthday letter linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

By Sakura Ellis ·

Illustration for: Judge Permanently Blocks Trump's $10 Billion Libel Case Against Wall Street Journal
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The legal battle over a birthday letter for Jeffrey Epstein ended in a permanent loss for Donald Trump on Saturday. U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed the president's $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media proprietor Rupert Murdoch. Gayles described the legal effort as "grasping at straws" and ruled with prejudice, a designation that prevents the case from being refiled.

The core of the dispute centers on a story published last year regarding a sexually suggestive letter and drawing. The newspaper reported that the item, which bore Trump's name, was part of a 2003 album compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday. The text was framed by the outline of a hand-drawn naked woman and concluded with the phrase, "Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret." Trump has consistently denied writing the letter, labeling the reporting "false, malicious, and defamatory."

The ruling highlights the specific legal hurdle that public figures must clear to win libel cases. Gayles cited the 1964 Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which requires proof that a media outlet knowingly published falsehoods or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The judge found the amended complaint fell short of this standard, noting that allegations of malice were "conclusory, vague, sometimes inconsistent with the Article, and often irrelevant." The court also observed that the story did not ignore Trump's denial, but rather informed readers that he decried the letter as a fake.

This dismissal follows a previous rejection of the suit in April, when Gayles granted Trump an opportunity to file an amended complaint. The president's legal team utilized that window in May to resubmit their claims. However, the judge determined that the lawsuit attempted to "manufacture" flaws in the investigative reporting rather than establishing that the defendants made defamatory statements with the requisite intent.

The outcome lands in the middle of a turbulent period for the administration's relationship with news organizations. Trump has pursued adversarial legal actions against several major outlets during his second term. Currently, the BBC, The Associated Press, and CNN, MS NOW, and Politico are involved in separate legal proceedings. The latter group is suing for restored access after Trump banished them from the White House in mid-September. The White House did not immediately issue a public reaction to Saturday's decision.

The underlying facts of the case involve a timeline that stretches back more than two decades. The letter was collected by Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite, for Epstein's birthday album. This compilation was created years before Epstein's first arrest in 2006 and his subsequent falling out with Trump. Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

Source: WBAA

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Newz Broadcast in your inboxFresh headlines, all day. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Newz Broadcast in your inboxFresh headlines, all day. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.