Midterm Election: Tax Cuts Clashed With Medicaid Cuts
Voters in states like Arkansas report daily disruptions to health services, while candidates debate the bill's impact on middle-class affordability ahead of November.
By Rebecca Svoboda ·

President Donald Trump defended the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at a rally in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Tuesday. He stated that the legislation, signed in July 2025, delivers the largest tax cuts in American history. Trump told the crowd that the law provides no tax on tips and no tax on overtime pay. He argued that these measures are helping Americans as they prepare to vote in the 2026 midterm elections.
The bill passed after a period of intense negotiation within the Republican-controlled Congress. It took effect in July of last year. The law introduced new tax breaks for workers while simultaneously reducing funding for several social service programs. Republicans have promoted the tax relief aspects throughout the campaign cycle. Representative Derrick Van Order of Wisconsin spoke at the party's convention in September about these specific benefits.
Critics argue that the tax cuts do not offset rising daily expenses. Dr. Todd Belt, a professor at George Washington University, noted that affordability remains the primary concern for voters. He said that high gasoline and grocery prices are making it difficult for households to make ends meet, regardless of their tax bill. Democrats have focused their messaging on the portions of the law that benefit high-income earners. In Texas, Senate candidate James Talarico proposed in an August interview that the tax breaks for the top 1 percent be reversed. He suggested redirecting that money to a cost-of-living tax adjustment for the middle class.
The bill also changed Medicaid policies and reduced benefits in several states. Amber Mader, a voter in Arkansas, said these changes are influencing how she evaluates candidates. Mader relies on Medicaid and Social Security Disability income. She is paralyzed and depends on home health care nursing and transportation services. Mader reported that these services have been reduced since the law was enacted. She stated that the tax cuts provide no direct financial benefit to her household. Instead, she faces daily difficulties and disruptions to basic services that are not optional for her.
Tax experts suggest the bill's effects will shift over time. Elena Patel, co-director of the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center, said tax policy is difficult to use for immediate affordability issues. Patel observed that the early changes benefited middle and lower-class families. However, she predicted that people will notice the law benefiting high-income taxpayers as time passes. The midterm elections will determine if voters prioritize the tax cuts or the service reductions when they cast their ballots.
The next major step in the campaign is the upcoming election day. Voters will decide on state and federal seats. The outcome will reflect their stance on the bill's mixed impacts. Candidates in swing states have already adjusted their platforms to address these specific policy points. The final votes will determine the composition of the new Congress.
Source: WOIO





